This page is founded on a Wikipedia piece written by contributors (read/edit). Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; more damage may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
Loving v. Virginia | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Syllabus Virginia's act scheme to forbid marriages 'tween persons solely on the basis of group classifications held to break the Equal protective cover and Due cognitive process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. In June, 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a Negro woman, and Richard Loving, a caucasoid man, were married in the territory of Columbia consistent to its laws. For reasons which seem to us to point the cardinal significant of those integral commands, we conclude that these statutes cannot support systematically with the Fourteenth Amendment. This suit presents a property interrogative sentence never addressed by this Court: whether a statutory scheme adopted by the State of Virginia to prevent marriages 'tween persons solely on the foundation of racial classifications violates the coordinate Protection and Due phenomenon Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation | History News
I denote a link to it on my facebook Page; Inter-racial Couples for Same-Sex Marriage. I am a part of an inter-racial couples and I consider we need to declare bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional as we did with Loving. Please coming together and "like" my page if you check to show support /pages/Inter-racial-Couples-for-Same-sex-Marriage/114099548632459 I opine this is a selfsame stimulating writeup.